The UK Pensions Regulator’s (TPR) code of practice on funding for defined benefit (DB) pensions appears to have had little impact on schemes’ likelihood of de-risking. But its emphasis on schemes setting long-term objectives and its encouragement of greater investment and funding flexibility may yet exert an influence.
Insurers are favouring funded re as it helps firms manage the market and longevity risks associated with writing bulk purchase annuity (BPA) business by reducing capital charges and therefore making PRT deals more competitive.
Unsurprisingly, given its growth and potential for capital optimisation, UK regulators have been carefully watching the increased use of funded re. In June 2023, the Prudential Regulatory Authority (PRA) sent a “Dear CRO’ letter to heads of risk at UK life insurers.
The letter outlined the regulator’s two main concerns from a sectoral review which it had carried out.
“One of the key risks arising in funded re is that firms recapture sub-optimal portfolios with depressed values and with limited ability to be transformed effectively to the firms’ preferred portfolio,” the PRA letter said.
Post a comment
Related Posts
Regulatory Progress Has Boosted Life Settlements, Yet Education Remains Key to Growth
Changes to the NCOIL life settlement model act in the past 25 years have been…
Is It Time to Rate Life ILS Structures?
The subject of whether life insurance-linked securities (life ILS) structures should be rated or not…
Are Bulk Purchase Annuity Buy-Ins Set to Feature More Often in the US Pension Risk Transfer Market?
Traditionally, PRT transactions in the US are of the buy-out variety, a trend driven by…
An Improved Actuarial Framework for Pricing Life Settlement Litigation Risk
Litigation risk in the life settlement market takes multiple forms, from cost of insurance increases…
