Alternative credit comes in many different shapes and sizes, with fund managers of all sorts of strategies competing for a slice of an institutional investor’s illiquid credit allocation. The risk exposures and sources of return in these products vary significantly, and each has a solid claim for a place in a diversified portfolio for different reasons.
Insurers are favouring funded re as it helps firms manage the market and longevity risks associated with writing bulk purchase annuity (BPA) business by reducing capital charges and therefore making PRT deals more competitive.
Unsurprisingly, given its growth and potential for capital optimisation, UK regulators have been carefully watching the increased use of funded re. In June 2023, the Prudential Regulatory Authority (PRA) sent a “Dear CRO’ letter to heads of risk at UK life insurers.
The letter outlined the regulator’s two main concerns from a sectoral review which it had carried out.
“One of the key risks arising in funded re is that firms recapture sub-optimal portfolios with depressed values and with limited ability to be transformed effectively to the firms’ preferred portfolio,” the PRA letter said.
Post a comment
Related Posts
Number of Deals, Aggregate Face Value Both Up As Life Settlement Market Continues Growth Trajectory
The life settlement industry’s secondary market has grown for the third consecutive year, according to…
Regulatory Oversight to Provide UK Bulk Purchase Annuity Market with Busy Few Years
The UK’s Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) will introduce stress testing for insurers’ exposure to funded…
PHL Variable Rehabilitation Emphasises Need for Prudent Counterparty Risk Management
In mid-May, Connecticut Insurance Commissioner Andrew N. Mais filed a ‘Petition for Rehabilitation and Appointment…
Is Education the Primary Driver of Life Expectancy?
The UK’s Institute and Faculty of Actuaries includes data from as far back as 1825…
