A well-run bulk annuity process can look plain sailing, whilst a badly run one is very much battling choppier waters. Below, we consider some of the different advisory structures for leading a bulk annuity process, including the rise of co-led processes. It’s important to use an experienced team to avoid those icebergs in the water.
Insurers are favouring funded re as it helps firms manage the market and longevity risks associated with writing bulk purchase annuity (BPA) business by reducing capital charges and therefore making PRT deals more competitive.
Unsurprisingly, given its growth and potential for capital optimisation, UK regulators have been carefully watching the increased use of funded re. In June 2023, the Prudential Regulatory Authority (PRA) sent a “Dear CRO’ letter to heads of risk at UK life insurers.
The letter outlined the regulator’s two main concerns from a sectoral review which it had carried out.
“One of the key risks arising in funded re is that firms recapture sub-optimal portfolios with depressed values and with limited ability to be transformed effectively to the firms’ preferred portfolio,” the PRA letter said.
Post a comment
Related Posts
Would the Senior Health Planning Account Act Have Been a Silver Bullet for the Life Settlement Market?
If you speak to a life settlement broker in the US, they will tell you…
Streamlined Pension Risk Transfer Deals Widen Small Scheme Opportunities
Growth in the purchase of bulk purchase annuity (BPA) contracts by small defined benefit (DB)…
Weight Loss Drugs the Talk of the Town in Actuarial Circles
Google recently published its list of terms most searched for in 2024, one unsurprisingly dominated…
How Many More Asset Managers Can the US Pension Risk Transfer Market Absorb?
The increasing role – and influence – of ‘private equity’ firms in the US pension…
