
Those in the US life insurance industry, and its associated markets, might be forgiven for experiencing some level of credit risk fatigue, such has been the volume of articles and content produced in the past year or so related to this topic.
Insurers are favouring funded re as it helps firms manage the market and longevity risks associated with writing bulk purchase annuity (BPA) business by reducing capital charges and therefore making PRT deals more competitive.
Unsurprisingly, given its growth and potential for capital optimisation, UK regulators have been carefully watching the increased use of funded re. In June 2023, the Prudential Regulatory Authority (PRA) sent a “Dear CRO’ letter to heads of risk at UK life insurers.
The letter outlined the regulator’s two main concerns from a sectoral review which it had carried out.
“One of the key risks arising in funded re is that firms recapture sub-optimal portfolios with depressed values and with limited ability to be transformed effectively to the firms’ preferred portfolio,” the PRA letter said.
Post a comment Cancel reply
Related Posts
Capital-Backed Journey Plans Re-Enter Defined Benefit Pension De-Risking Debate as New Rules Loom
In 2020 the first capital-backed journey plan (CBJP) was completed, ushering a new way of…
Understanding the Impact of Covid-19 on Future Mortality Remains An Almost Impossible Task
It has been a little more than five years since most of the world began…
Canadian Pension Risk Transfer Market Set to Establish Higher Floor as Aggregate Deal Value Surges
Aggregate deal value in the Canadian pension risk transfer (PRT) market set a new record…
Could Climate Change Cause the Buy-In Market To Collapse?
We’ve been researching the environmental, social and governance (ESG) approaches of bulk annuity providers since…