Much of the conversation around the involvement of alternative asset managers in the life insurance industry in the past few years has centred around both the pension risk transfer market and the asset-intensive life reinsurance market in the US. In both cases, the investment firm enjoys the benefits that access to higher-yielding, private investments provides.
Insurers are favouring funded re as it helps firms manage the market and longevity risks associated with writing bulk purchase annuity (BPA) business by reducing capital charges and therefore making PRT deals more competitive.
Unsurprisingly, given its growth and potential for capital optimisation, UK regulators have been carefully watching the increased use of funded re. In June 2023, the Prudential Regulatory Authority (PRA) sent a “Dear CRO’ letter to heads of risk at UK life insurers.
The letter outlined the regulator’s two main concerns from a sectoral review which it had carried out.
“One of the key risks arising in funded re is that firms recapture sub-optimal portfolios with depressed values and with limited ability to be transformed effectively to the firms’ preferred portfolio,” the PRA letter said.
Post a comment
Related Posts
New Life Settlement Provider Data Illustrates Continued Evolution of Secondary Life Settlement Market
Life settlement market continuing growth trajectory despite overall reduction in life settlement provider licenses.
End-Game Clarity Shaping UK Pension Risk Transfer Market but Large Schemes Still on the Sidelines
Run-on options for schemes small and large set to become real consideration for UK defined…
Litigation Update: Estate of Martha Barotz v. Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, et al.
A recent decision by the Delaware Court of Chancery brings some clarity to life settlement…
The Crucial Role of Regular Medical Record Reviews in Life Settlement Investments
Updating the life expectancy of an insured throughout the life of a life settlement investment…
