A decision in June by the Delaware Court of Chancery in Estate of Martha Barotz v. Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB (Barotz) resulted in a partial win for the defendants. .
Insurers are favouring funded re as it helps firms manage the market and longevity risks associated with writing bulk purchase annuity (BPA) business by reducing capital charges and therefore making PRT deals more competitive.
Unsurprisingly, given its growth and potential for capital optimisation, UK regulators have been carefully watching the increased use of funded re. In June 2023, the Prudential Regulatory Authority (PRA) sent a “Dear CRO’ letter to heads of risk at UK life insurers.
The letter outlined the regulator’s two main concerns from a sectoral review which it had carried out.
“One of the key risks arising in funded re is that firms recapture sub-optimal portfolios with depressed values and with limited ability to be transformed effectively to the firms’ preferred portfolio,” the PRA letter said.
Related Posts
New Life Settlement Provider Data Illustrates Continued Evolution of Secondary Life Settlement Market
Life settlement market continuing growth trajectory despite overall reduction in life settlement provider licenses.
End-Game Clarity Shaping UK Pension Risk Transfer Market but Large Schemes Still on the Sidelines
Run-on options for schemes small and large set to become real consideration for UK defined…
The Crucial Role of Regular Medical Record Reviews in Life Settlement Investments
Updating the life expectancy of an insured throughout the life of a life settlement investment…
South Dakota Supreme Court Upholds Life Settlement Investor’s Right to Retain $10 Million Death Benefit
Decision is a significant positive development for investors in the life settlement industry as it…